tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5717569190258223605.comments2012-04-26T11:54:02.724-04:00NSinNYhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01013798717657416824noreply@blogger.comBlogger167125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5717569190258223605.post-91216616203998083862012-04-26T11:54:02.724-04:002012-04-26T11:54:02.724-04:00W@hy not Justice SODA-MEYER? Most people can easily pronounce that!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5717569190258223605.post-61149401284477991422010-08-27T09:16:00.259-04:002010-08-27T09:16:00.259-04:00Pssst... come over to my blog!Mad Men Girlhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01813997592667345944noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5717569190258223605.post-7872376465841085082009-08-11T21:08:39.993-04:002009-08-11T21:08:39.993-04:00wow.. the above sounds pretty, into it.<br />well anyways i&#39;m a fan too of nyrestroom. but a normal one.<br />there&#39;s a new site that i think the same group made<br />its www.jerseyshorerestrooms.com pretty hilariousAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5717569190258223605.post-73073517320540883202009-07-13T18:14:06.558-04:002009-07-13T18:14:06.558-04:00fuck youAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5717569190258223605.post-44465843012575166712009-07-10T10:10:15.784-04:002009-07-10T10:10:15.784-04:00well written sirThe Saucehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05368278467978821253noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5717569190258223605.post-11828274001801382582009-07-03T17:04:17.840-04:002009-07-03T17:04:17.840-04:00keeping it to 1 album per artist ..<br /><br />beatles - abbey road<br />allman brothers - eat a peach<br />rolling stones - stickey fingers<br />zeppelin - II<br />derek and the dominos - layla<br />the band - music from big pink<br />miles davis - kind of blue<br />grateful dead - american beauty<br />black crowes - amorica<br />crosby stills &amp; nash - crosby stills &amp; nash<br />pink floyd - wish you were here<br />radiohead - the bends<br />the who - who&#39;s next<br />neil young - zuma<br />pearl jam - tenAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5717569190258223605.post-71511743303899851962009-07-02T17:48:12.707-04:002009-07-02T17:48:12.707-04:00radiohead, OK computer<br />joy division, unknown pleasures<br />the smiths, the queen is dead<br />the pixies, doolittle<br />fugazi, 13 songs<br />the clash, the clash<br />mission of burma, signals, calls &amp; marches<br />pavement, crooked rain, crooked rain<br />the beatles, abbey road, or sgt. pepper’s (i can’t remember which blew my mind first)<br />liz phair, exile in guyville<br />weezer, pinkerton<br />the velvet underground, VU<br />sonic youth, daydream nation<br />beastie boys, ill communication<br />david bowie, changesbowie (OK, admittedly, that’s a best-of)JJKnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5717569190258223605.post-81733006305262075922009-07-01T23:06:02.128-04:002009-07-01T23:06:02.128-04:00I&#39;m proud of Crisco. He must have had someone pretty cool to play some great music for him when he was a younker.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5717569190258223605.post-46761708287179717232009-06-18T20:42:23.387-04:002009-06-18T20:42:23.387-04:00retort duly noted.The Saucehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05368278467978821253noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5717569190258223605.post-9478695520440198312009-06-18T18:59:59.875-04:002009-06-18T18:59:59.875-04:00crisco, i&#39;m moved by your honesty in including under the table and dreaming, and will try to be similarly candid. <br /><br />1. exile on main street - rolling stones<br />2. return of the rentals - the rentals<br />3. pinkerton - weezer<br />4. ten - pearl jam<br />5. surfacing - sarah mclachlan<br />6. if you&#39;re feeling sinister - belle and sebastian<br />7. the brown album - the band (thanks to crisco)<br />8. the times they are a-changing - bob dylan<br />9. graceland - paul simon<br />10. broken - nine inch nails<br />11. when i was born for the seventh time - cornershop<br />12. joshua tree - u2<br />13. more adventurous - rilo kiley<br />14. chutes too narrow - the shins<br />15. ladies and gentlemen we are floating in space - spiritualized<br />16. don&#39;t tell me what i can put on my list dude - the eaglesNSinNYhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01013798717657416824noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5717569190258223605.post-29214247114048561072009-06-09T10:40:22.736-04:002009-06-09T10:40:22.736-04:00two are movies. <br />i’m sad chuck berry, jay-z and john legend don’t fit.<br /><br />black on both sides <br />i never loved a man the way i love you<br />dusty in memphis <br />blood sugar sex magic<br />the rhythm of the saints <br />the headphone masterpiece<br />do you want more?!!!??!<br />are you experienced?<br />the last waltz <br />the kids are alright<br />highway 61 revisited<br />exile on main street<br />under the table and dreaming<br />grace <br />what’s going on?Criscohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06155011868978369946noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5717569190258223605.post-1421366663333069002009-05-29T15:34:33.584-04:002009-05-29T15:34:33.584-04:00what the hell kind of name is krikorian, anyway? he should be thankful someone fudged the bucket and dropped the initial "p" when his grandpappy rolled up into ellis island in a sloopdy. that's adaptationabhignyahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03187727474676900808noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5717569190258223605.post-55591258013880855442009-05-13T17:30:00.000-04:002009-05-13T17:30:00.000-04:00Is he related to Judge Reinhold?Damonhttp://blogs.seattleweekly.com/dailyweeklynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5717569190258223605.post-65731318075048718532009-05-12T11:33:00.000-04:002009-05-12T11:33:00.000-04:00the fat-headed baby was named after you, angelina, and your big-headedness. even before we knew in our minds that you were big-headed, we felt it in our hearts and celebrated it.<br /><br />and yeah, it was way cold at the glacier--in large part because of all the air that gets chilled as it travels over the miles of frozen glacier. <br /><br />about the empanadas, there were none left to photograph after i ate them all.NSinNYhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01013798717657416824noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5717569190258223605.post-23721445898554171402009-05-11T21:47:00.000-04:002009-05-11T21:47:00.000-04:00I expect more pictures of empanadasAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5717569190258223605.post-42821224946941065072009-05-11T14:31:00.000-04:002009-05-11T14:31:00.000-04:00Fantastic photos! I particularly like the grey glacier. Was it super cold there? By the way, where did you get "Fat-Headed Baby?" I was a big-headed baby :(Angelinahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11603937376642274038noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5717569190258223605.post-87190429523627889752009-05-11T12:00:00.000-04:002009-05-11T12:00:00.000-04:00the rainmaker was pretty good as far as that formula goes. aside from that, i'm on board with your take on ffc.NSinNYhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01013798717657416824noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5717569190258223605.post-45325801343535822302009-05-09T14:20:00.000-04:002009-05-09T14:20:00.000-04:00Is it as asinine as I imagine?The Saucehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05368278467978821253noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5717569190258223605.post-52222554006288425382009-04-22T10:07:00.000-04:002009-04-22T10:07:00.000-04:00reminder: you never vetted statements made in the TPM article, or addressed my questions about it. but since TPM said it, it must be so. pelosi says astroturf, TPM and the rest repeat it, and so it is. anyway, the protests had less to do with the taxes themselves, and more to do with what the taxes are being used for. <br /><br />believe it or not, use of govt. funds is a mainstream concern, as much as the MSM would like to change that. bailouts weren't popular under bush http://cbs2.com/national/poll.bailout.plan.2.826496.html and they're not popular under obama http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/03/16/opinion/polls/main4870196.shtml. that's what the rallies were about. 500bn here, another 500bn there, and the bailout for the press can't be far behind. while we're at it, let's see who else we can put on the govt's tab?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5717569190258223605.post-61320319722004463602009-04-21T12:37:00.000-04:002009-04-21T12:37:00.000-04:00if only.....Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5717569190258223605.post-45257526198314626542009-04-21T10:44:00.000-04:002009-04-21T10:44:00.000-04:00"feel free to leave at anytime." fine advice, indeed. good day.NSinNYhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01013798717657416824noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5717569190258223605.post-10555987837322743322009-04-21T10:30:00.000-04:002009-04-21T10:30:00.000-04:00you've revealed much about your character here. <br /><br />you're again dishonest using the term "homophobes" when i spoke specifically of those who personally disagree with homosexual behavior. your strawman arguments may seem strong as you destroy the scarecrow, and they may even impress the couple of other people who waste their time reading this blog, but as objectively convincing rhetoric goes, they're worthless.<br /><br />so strong is your proclivity for the strawman attack that it's clearly futile to engage you on real issues, such as your own logical inconsistencies. such discourse is clearly something which you do not wish to engage in, since, as you show in the supreme court discussion, you will willfully discard entire portions of the discussion (which happen to be among the strongest rebuttals of your ideological opponents) in favor of incessantly repeating only your strongest "pro" arguments. one of the first tenets of writing persuasively is that one must seek to controvert the opponents strongest points first and most thoroughly. you simply avoid them and cry about your strongest points. it's classically childish.<br /><br />further, you'd apparently rather have no debate at all, given your "you're just wasting all of our time" approach to any criticism. why not engage with the ideas rather than divert away from the chiefest objections? an exegesis i do not want. for you to touch on the legitimate judicial exceptions the dissenters take isn't too much to ask. you, instead, throw a tantrum, and repeatedly ask for respite from having to respond with said tantrum. if you don't want to throw a tantrum, don't. <br /><br />also, nsinny is the user using TPM repeatedly, and is the only user talking about politics. i can only guess at where the rest of the content comes from. huffpo probably, media matters. similarly partisan sources, no doubt. your joke about jon stewart reading clearly indicates that you wish he would, and that you identify with his politics. the black pubic hair on the peanut butter is telling as well. matt taibbi is a joke. rolling stone? seriously? the equivalency between de-handing thieves and jail time for thieves is laughable. (your "kind" link in what the hell kind of country they live in line is dead, as is the FMM link, btw.) the death in prison, while a shame, is evidence that shit happens. it's clear you think that this country is shit. please feel free to leave at any time.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5717569190258223605.post-52154123406119847102009-04-20T18:38:00.000-04:002009-04-20T18:38:00.000-04:00also, for the record, tpm is a great, well-researched site, with a skeptical, journalistic approach to its subject matter. it basically broke the us attorney story, has done some great reporting on contractors in iraq and afghanistan, and has been among the best at documenting corruption among both republican and democratic elected officials. <br /><br />you seem to think i should hate tpm if i hate beck, sort of like you embarrassingly thought that hating homophobes is analagous to hating gays. i'm sticking with ad hominem because the day is short, and there is not time to show you how empty some of these ideas truly are.NSinNYhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01013798717657416824noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5717569190258223605.post-54936946982468882692009-04-20T18:30:00.000-04:002009-04-20T18:30:00.000-04:00please. let's not degrade the word "constructive" by applying it to this: "and....back reading TPM and only TPM. <br />had a hunch that's all this blog was, but it's kool-aid is the evidence all over your lips. if glennbeck wards off righty autoasphyxiation, TPM is your inhaler." you follow that by saying i get all my content from tpm (which is an excellent site with some solid reporting), and are able to cite only two links out of 70+ posts, almost all of which have one or more links. <br /><br />are you seriously whining about my being dismissive of those pieces of shit? get your head out of your ass. <br /><br />and thomas is a bigot, although it's probably not worth going through this again. i told you to read romer to figure it out because i don't feel a need to explain to you what people who pay attention to gay rights have known for a decade. you said you did, but then you said that i was reading too much into the word "animus," the essential concept in the majority holding, which was more or less proof that either you didn't read it or you didn't understand. <br /><br />on this: "and i clearly know enough to know that there is some legal basis for the 3 judges you referenced to demur at your liberal orthodoxy. you reject that by not even speaking to the central tenets which they cited. nice work." i showed you precisely the sections of thomas and scalia's opinions that i (and pretty much every gay person I knew in law school) find bigoted, which was the topic of discussion, and i even unpacked the idea of equal protection so that you would realize why your rambling comment about the word "gay-bashing" was nonsensical. now you want an exegesis on the entire decison. <br /><br />it's this pointless, whiny bullshit ("how come you didn't write an essay about all conservative jurisprudence on gay rights?") that makes you a heckler and not a legitimate commentor. <br /><br />if you want, i can just put a line at the end of all my political posts that says "warning: sensitive conservatives object to these ideas but are bad at articulating why aside from feigning outrage and nitpicking." that way you won't have to write anything at all and can just go straight to tpm, the glenn beck of the coasts, or whatever you think it is.NSinNYhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01013798717657416824noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5717569190258223605.post-58305626322087351382009-04-20T17:53:00.000-04:002009-04-20T17:53:00.000-04:00I'll have the pancakes in the Age of Enlightenment!Damonhttp://blogs.seattleweekly.com/dailyweeklynoreply@blogger.com